Tuesday, March 6, 2012

Univocal, Equivocal, and Analogous Terms


This is a topic which we will probably have to return to in the future, but a start has to be made.  Definitions are inextricably bound up with terms, and one classification of terms  divides them up into Univocal, Equivocal, and Analogous.  Let us briefly review these three classes.  
  • Univocal Term: A terms that has only one meaning.  That is, it signifies only one concept, and thus corresponds to only one definition.  Such a term always has the same intension wherever it is used.   E.g. the term "entomology" signifies the study of insects. 
  • Equivocal Term: A term that has more than one meaning.  That is, it signifies more than one concept, and thus corresponds to more than one definition.  An equivocal term has different intensions when it is used.  E.g. the term "chihuahua" can signify (a) a breed of dog; (b) a state of Mexico. 
  • Analogous Term:  A term that is intended to convey one or more similar characteristics that exist between two concepts.  E.g. the term "data owner" is applied to individuals who have no legal title to the data they manage, but are expected to exercise responsibilities like those owners would typically exercise.  Sometimes an analogous term can be no different to an equivocal term. 
It is not always easy to know if a univocal term really is univocal.  For instance, I am not aware of any equivocal use of "entomology".  There might be, but I am unaware of it if it exists.  Also, a univocal term might become equivocal in the future.  

With respect to equivocal terms, a big problem is that there are far more concepts than there are terms to describe them.  This is a reason why equivocal terms come into being, and there seems to be no way to avoid it happening.  From a practical point of view the problems with equivocal terms arise when a term is being used equivocally in communication.  For instance, if I use "backup" within a group managing databases, everybody knows what I mean - even if " backup " has other meanings, such as in police operations. 

One way round this is to maintain specialized vocabularies for "subject fields" (as the terminologists call them).  Roughly speaking this means that an equivocal term can be taken to be univocal in a specific context.  We will need to come back to this.

Analogous terms are more difficult.    Problems include: (a) only one of the related objects is identified; (b) the characteristics supposedly in common between the two objects are never identified.  This means that an analogous term may not actually signify a concept - it may be unintelligible and just used for emotive effect.  It certainly implies that there is a more complex relationship between analogous terms and definitions.  This too we will have to return to.

44 comments:

  1. is there such thing as 3 kinds of equivocals?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. assignment yan ano kay ma'am sales..tama ba?

      Delete
    2. hahahaha tama classmate :)

      Delete
  2. example univocal man,student,teacher,..
    equivocal trunk it could be trunk of a tree or of a car and analogous:head like head of the family or a part of a body..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nice examples. Well done indeed.

      Delete
    2. well done indeed

      Delete
    3. Brilliantly done!Excellent examples in all 3 cases.

      Delete
  3. more examples please!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Univocal- atom, genes, laptop, Bible, Accounting, TV, etc.

    Equivocal- 1. Bank (bank as in the place where you put your money and river bank)
    2. Pitcher (water container and pitcher in baseball)

    Analogous- father (father as the head of the family or father as the head of the church)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bible with a capital B may very well be an univocal term when written but in speech one can informally refer to a book that one uses as a guide to life as one's 'bible'.
      Shows just how slippery language can be.

      Delete
  5. More examples please

    ReplyDelete
  6. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  7. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  8. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Professor Chisholm put this material here to HELP you, Anonymous! He didn't put it here for you to mess ABOUT with!!!

    ReplyDelete
  10. If I were you, I'd go and see him as soon as term begins, and apologise. Say you just got carried away or something.

    ReplyDelete
  11. what are the example of equivocal terms?

    ReplyDelete
  12. healthy food brings healthy body is a analogous or equivocal? need ur ans. pleaseee

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We are studying that in our Logic

      Delete
    2. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    3. No, it is analogous. Food is not in itself healthy. It is only healthy in regards to us eating it.

      Delete
  13. what was the best title for this subject? for my written report please.

    ReplyDelete
  14. What the fuuuq mudafackaaaaa

    ReplyDelete
  15. example of these three terms, as soon as possible.. with conclusion please

    ReplyDelete
  16. What expresses a term that is used in an identical sense?

    ReplyDelete
  17. Can you give me a 5 examples for analogous terms basing in our course General Management. Please help. Thank you

    ReplyDelete
  18. Can you give me a 5 examples for analogous terms basing in our course General Management. Please help. Thank you

    ReplyDelete
  19. Hellow! Somebody know what is the answer?
    Here's the question.
    1. Equivocal=30
    2. Analogoue=10
    Please. Thanks!

    ReplyDelete
  20. Ex. St. Peter's "square"
    Is it univocal , equivocal or analogical?

    ReplyDelete
  21. Are fixed assets, trading and shareholders univocal?

    ReplyDelete
  22. Hello, how do you distinguish extrinsic analogy and intrinsic analogy?

    ReplyDelete
  23. there weren't too many examples :(

    ReplyDelete